Skip to main content

What should my students say about meter?

Many schools use the AQA English Literature specification for GCSE, and will be used to teaching Tennyson’s ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ as part of the Conflict and Power cluster of poems. It seems to be one of the more popular poems, and this might relate to the poem’s memorable rhythm - this certainly seemed to be the case in a video I saw a few months ago of some school students vigorously reciting it in their playground in unison with their teacher. 

English teachers love complicated terminology, and like me, you have probably taught your students that the energetic rhythm is achieved through Tennyson’s use of dactylic dimeter (BAH-ba-ba BAH-ba-ba). When I first started teaching this poem, I would tell students that this was to evoke the sound of the Light Brigade galloping towards the enemy on horseback. 

This isn’t wrong, but I found that my students would tag this on to their answers - seemingly just so they could use the complicated terminology. Students were not linking their ideas to their own personal response to the text. 

If students were to begin with something like ‘Tennyson heightens the drama of the charge, to emphasise the bravery of the Light Brigade’, I think the comment about the meter evoking galloping horses is now relevant - students have to consider what the technique is doing, in relation to the poet’s intent. 

This can be demonstrated with the following line:

‘Charge for the guns!’ he said

Dactylic dimeter is used in this line to aurally highlight the words ‘charge’ and ‘guns’. These two words stick out, and arguably this achieves the same effect as the aforementioned galloping horses effect - these two words are exciting/dramatic elements of conflict (fighting and killing), that help to bring the battle to life. 

But what about the words that aren’t stressed? In this line, we have ‘for the’ and ‘he said’. I can’t see any significance in the former unstressed phrase, but the latter seems really important to me when I consider what I know about this poem contextually. Tennyson arguably wishes to emphasise bravery, and minimise the mistake - the ‘blunder’ by the commanding officers is only mentioned once in the poem. As the speech tag ‘he said’ is unstressed due to the meter of the line, it helps to brush this embarrassing detail under the carpet. I would likely use this reference in a paragraph that began like this:

Tennyson minimises the mistakes that were made in the Battle of Balaclava, so that the audience are mainly focused on the bravery and glory of the Light Brigade. 

A simple set of questions that you might ask your students to consider when studying a text that has a particular meter are:

Why does the writer stress these words?

Why does the writer make these words unstressed?

This could apply to poetry, or a Shakespeare text. For example, in Act I Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet, Romeo utters the following when seeing Juliet for the first time:


If I profane with my unworthiest hand

This holy shrine, the gentle sin is this:

My lips, two blushing pilgrims, ready stand

To smooth that rough touch with a tender kiss


The following words, that are stressed in iambic pentameter, interest me

profane

hand

holy

shrine

sin

lips

smooth

rough

kiss

As a DO NOW task, before reading this scene, students could be asked to consider connections between these words. Later on in the lesson, you could provide students with the terminology (iambic pentameter), which would hopefully allow them to discuss the method from a position that is rooted more in authorial intent, rather than simply tagging on the terminology. 

The views in this blog are not necessarily shared or endorsed by the centre that I currently work at.

Photo at the top of the page by Nathan Anderson on Unsplash


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to read like an English teacher - Part 1

If you have a job as an English teacher, it’s a fairly safe bet that you enjoy reading. You probably read a lot when you were younger too. I remember reading lots of Stephen King books when I was about 13-14 and feeling very grown up, because I got something that adults read and enjoyed. You have also likely enjoyed the benefits of reading lots of books - the most obvious one being good literacy skills. Also, when analysing texts in the classroom, you can likely figure out authorial intent with ease, not stopping to think how you were able to do this - you just can! When teaching, I sometimes find stepping out of my own perspective to be very difficult. I have been criticised (rightly) by some of my colleagues for pitching things way too high in the resources that I make, and not considering the needs of students who perhaps struggle with English - students who might even despise reading. Psychologists refer to this as ‘the curse of expertise’ - if we are very good at something

Pinpointing the debate in Literature essay questions

  Pinpointing the debate in Literature essay questions One of the main differences between GCSE and A Level English Literature is the format of the questions that they will have to answer. At GCSE, your students will be asked to explore  a key theme or character(s). For example, here is a question about Romeo and Juliet  from AQA's 2018 GCSE English Literature Paper 1: Starting with this moment in the play, explore how Shakespeare presents relationships between adults and young people in Romeo and Juliet. Nothing needs to be debated in that question, it asks us to simply 'explore' relationships between the young people and adults in the play. Granted, a student who wants a very high grade might include a conceptualised response to this question, which would involve debate, but it is not essential for your students to do this to get a decent grade. Now, let's look at an A Level English Literature essay question from the same exam board: ‘Moments of happiness in tragedies